Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin 1998;36:60-61; doi:10.1136/dtb.1998.36860
Copyright © 1998 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

{blacktriangledown}Donepezil update

Relevant BNF section: 4.11

In October 1997, we reviewed {blacktriangledown}donepezil (Aricept-Eisai; Pfizer) as a new treatment for Alzheimer's disease and, on the evidence available, could not recommend its use. We argued that the position would change if more tangible evidence became available showing that the product offers real improvement in patients' wellbeing.1 Since then, the results of two more randomised controlled trials have been published,2,3 as has a long-term follow-up study of participants in the original study.4,5 Here we review our position, taking into account these new data.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
Y. Doyle
Equity in the new NHS: hard lessons from implementing a local healthcare policy on donepezil
BMJ, July 28, 2001; 323(7306): 222 - 224.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About DTB - Privacy policy - Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online - Web site terms and conditions - Feedback

© 1998 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.