<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com">
<title>Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin recent issues</title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com</link>
<description>Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0012-6543</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/10/73?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/10/76?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/10/79?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/9/65?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/9/69?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/8/57?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/8/62?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/46/8/64?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/7/49?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/7/53?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/7/55?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.dtb.bmj.com/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.dtb.bmj.com/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin</title>
<url>http://www.dtb.bmj.com/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/10/73?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[{blacktriangledown}Aliskiren for hypertension in adults]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/10/73?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>High blood pressure is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease worldwide.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> Drug treatments include those that target the renin-angiotensin system, a key hormone cascade in the regulation of blood pressure. One of these is aliskiren (Rasilez &ndash; Novartis), which belongs to a new class of drugs, direct renin inhibitors.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> Here we assess its place in managing adults with hypertension.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular Medicine, Cardiovascular system]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.09.0022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[{blacktriangledown}Aliskiren for hypertension in adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>76</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/10/76?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[{blacktriangledown}Retapamulin for impetigo and other infections]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/10/76?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Last year, we concluded that topical fusidic acid should be first-line treatment for impetigo.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> Since then, retapamulin ointment (Altargo &ndash; GlaxoSmithKline), a new antibacterial, has been licensed in the European Union as a short-term treatment for impetigo and infected small lacerations, abrasions or sutured wounds in people aged 9 months or above.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> Advertisements claim that the product "treats localised impetigo in just 5 days";<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b3">3</cross-ref> by comparison, the <I>British National Formulary</I> (<I>BNF</I>) advises a 7-day course of fusidic acid.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b4">4</cross-ref> Here we consider the place of retapamulin in impetigo and its other licensed indications.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Dermatology, Infectious diseases, Infections]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.09.0023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[{blacktriangledown}Retapamulin for impetigo and other infections]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>79</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>76</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/10/79?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[{blacktriangledown}Erdosteine for copd exacerbations]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/10/79?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The mucolytic drug erdosteine (Erdotin &ndash; Galen) is licensed in the UK as treatment for up to 10 days "for the symptomatic treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in adults".<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> This indication differs from that for carbocisteine and mecysteine, two older mucolytic drugs that are licensed for adjunctive treatment in respiratory disorders characterised by viscous mucus, and typically used for longer to prevent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> Does erdosteine have a role for people with COPD exacerbations?</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Respiratory system, Paediatrics (drugs and medicines), Malignant disease and immunosuppression, Ear, nose and throat, Immunological products and vaccines, Respiratory medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.09.0024</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[{blacktriangledown}Erdosteine for copd exacerbations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>80</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/9/65?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Blood pressure guidelines - where are we now?]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/9/65?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In June 2006, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) updated its recommendations on the management of patients with hypertension (published in 2004), in light of "significant new data" relating to drug treatment.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref>,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> The update, published in collaboration with the British Hypertension Society (BHS), recommended first-line use of a calcium-channel blocker or a thiazide-type diuretic in patients aged over 55 years or an ACE inhibitor in those aged under 55 years, and advised that beta-blockers should no longer be used for routine initial therapy.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> Recently published data from England suggest that primary care prescribing has changed in line with this new guideline.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b3">3</cross-ref> However, interpretation of the evidence that underpins some of the key recommendations is open to debate, particularly as there are differences from some other major guidelines in the recommendations for first-line therapy. Here we consider the updated NICE guideline, the rationale for its treatment recommendations, and the subsequent change in clinical practice. In particular, we focus on the initial drug management of adults without conditions such as diabetes mellitus or coronary heart disease that would in themselves be a key determinant of management.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.09.0020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Blood pressure guidelines - where are we now?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>69</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>65</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/9/69?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[{blacktriangledown}Natalizumab for multiple sclerosis?]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/9/69?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Around 2.5 million people worldwide have multiple sclerosis, of whom about 85,000 are in the UK.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> Natalizumab (pronounced na-ta-<I>liz</I>-you-mab; Tysabri &ndash; Biogen Idec), the first in a new class known as selective adhesion-molecule inhibitors, is licensed in the UK as monotherapy for "highly active" relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> Here we review natalizumab and assess its place for patients with multiple sclerosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.09.0021</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[{blacktriangledown}Natalizumab for multiple sclerosis?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>72</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/8/57?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rituximab and {blacktriangledown}abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/8/57?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Estimates from the UK indicate that around 0.5&ndash;1.0% of the population have rheumatoid arthritis.1 Here we assess the place of rituximab (MabThera &ndash; Roche Products Ltd) and abatacept (Orencia &ndash; Bristol-Myers-Squibb), drugs in two new classes, which are licensed for certain adults with the condition.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.07.0017</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rituximab and {blacktriangledown}abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>61</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/8/62?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What role for {blacktriangledown}tigecycline in infections?]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/8/62?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Tigecycline (pronounced tie-ge-<I>sigh</I>-cleen; Tygacil &ndash; Wyeth) is a broad-spectrum antibacterial and the first glycylcycline to be marketed in the UK. It is active against certain resistant bacteria, including meticillin-resistant <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> (MRSA) and bacteria that produce extended-spectrum &beta;-lactamase (ESBL).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref>, <cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> Tigecycline is licensed for intravenous treatment of adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections, and complicated intra-abdominal infections.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> We review tigecycline and assess its place for these infections.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.07.0018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What role for {blacktriangledown}tigecycline in infections?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>64</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>62</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/46/8/64?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: surgery for obesity in adults]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/46/8/64?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Our review on <I>Surgery for obesity in adults</I> (<I>DTB</I> 2008; 46: 41&ndash;5) incorrectly suggested that, in relation to advice from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), "PCTs are obliged to provide funding to patients who meet the [NICE] criteria for surgery". In fact, the criteria referred to appear in a current NICE clinical guideline (CG) and, as a result, funding of provision is not mandatory. This is different from recommendations that appear in NICE technology appraisal guidance (TAG), which are usually mandatory within 3 months. This error does not affect our article&rsquo;s <I>Conclusion</I>.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.07.0019</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: surgery for obesity in adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>64</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>64</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/7/49?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Three new drugs for type 2 diabetes]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/7/49?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>For many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, metformin plus appropriate treatment for cardiovascular risk factors form the cornerstone of drug therapy.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> However, the progressive impairment of both the secretion and action of insulin in the condition mean that high blood glucose concentrations usually worsen over time, so necessitating escalation of hypoglycaemic therapy.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> Three drugs in two new classes that act on the hormonal regulation of insulin secretion have been launched recently for use as add-in therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes: exenatide (Byetta &ndash; Eli Lilly), sitagliptin (Januvia &ndash; MSD), and vildagliptin (Galvus &ndash; Novartis). Here we consider whether they have a role in the management of such individuals.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.06.0014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Three new drugs for type 2 diabetes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>52</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>49</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/7/53?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Update on managing bell's palsy]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/7/53?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Each year in the UK, around 1 in 5,000 people develops Bell&rsquo;s palsy &ndash; idiopathic unilateral lower motor neurone facial weakness of rapid onset.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> Of those who are not treated, about 16% end up with permanent moderate to severe weakness, which can result in facial dysfunction and disfigurement, and psychological difficulties.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref><sup>&ndash;</sup><cross-ref type="bib" refid="b5">5</cross-ref> There has been longstanding controversy about what, if any, treatment should be given, with potential alternatives including corticosteroids, antiviral drugs, acupuncture and physiotherapy.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b6">6</cross-ref> We last reviewed this condition in 2006, indicating that "published trials on the efficacy of drug treatments have been poor and no firm conclusions can be drawn about the benefit of any single drug", and "it is unclear what place, if any, acupuncture and physiotherapy have in the management of patients with Bell&rsquo;s palsy".<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b6">6</cross-ref> Here we update our conclusions in the light of recently published evidence.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.06.0015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Update on managing bell's palsy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>54</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>53</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/7/55?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tests for equivalence or non-inferiority - why?]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/7/55?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Drugs are sometimes assessed in clinical trials designed to test their equivalence or non-inferiority to a standard therapy. Non-inferiority trials, in particular, appear to be increasingly used to test new drugs, such as the oral hypoglycaemics reviewed in this issue of <I>DTB</I>.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> Here we summarise the main features of equivalence and non-inferiority trials and suggest what to look out for when reading study reports.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.06.0016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tests for equivalence or non-inferiority - why?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>56</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>55</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>